Home
I was amused by the story of the crooks who tried to buy office supplies using the charge code of a local prison. The purchases included computers, speakers, iPods, and apparently whatever was expensive. They came back three times. My favorite part of the story is "...the store manager grew suspicious."

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Laval+cops+bust+office+supplies+fraud+ring/2718495/story.html

I can see how crooks would consider it hilarious to rob a jail. But I have to think the correct number of times to try this particular crime is once. Or, as super criminals like to say, "One minivan's worth."

The big problem here is that the nature of the crime depends on putting the idea of a penitentiary in the mind of the cashier as the same time you are cleverly trying to act innocent with your prison haircut and/or mullet and tattoos. I wonder if one of the perps even considered throwing a package of Sticky Notes on the pile of computers and iPods to look more legit.

Anyway, this made me think of the famous question "What rhymes with orange?" If you have wrestled with that question before, you know the answer is either nothing or, at best, "door hinge." The interesting part is how quickly your brain can decide if a word can be rhymed or not. How do you arrive at that conclusion without trying all of the word combinations in your language first?

What rhymes with elephant?

See how quickly you realized the answer is nothing? I think the brain stores words that sound alike near each other, perhaps for some useful reason that isn't obvious. The by-product of that brain architecture is that humans are naturally good at rhyming. When you wonder what rhymes with train, you go almost instantly to brain, grain, main, and even playin' without really trying all the combinations that are not words or don't rhyme.

As a writer, you have to be very aware of how the brain stores information. For example, it would be a mistake to write the sentence "He murdered a doll," even in the context of humor. Dolls are stored in the brain somewhere near the area you keep your concept of children, and so the idea of murdering a doll gets registered with nearly the emotional revulsion as if you said, "He murdered a child."

And yes, I did just write the very thing I said you should avoid writing. But I'm a professional, and I know how to quickly cleanse your mental palate from that last thought by quoting four lines out of context from Lady GaGa's song Bad Romance.

"I want your ugly, I want your disease"

"I want your horror, I want your design"

"I want your love and I want your revenge"

"I want your psycho, your vertical stick"

My favorite of the group is "I want your horror, I want your design." I'm fairly certain that your brain stores the concept for horror in a different part of your brain than it does for the concept of design. All of the quoted lines are like that. It's the opposite of rhyming, as far as brain storage goes. I'd love to see an experiment where a subject's brain is monitored while reading rhymes and then again while reading the lyrics to Bad Romance. Nursery rhymes are literally used to put kids to sleep. When I hear Bad Romance, it's a whole-brain experience that wakes me up. (I couldn't find Lady GaGa's IQ listed online, but I'll bet it's off the chart.)

As a writer (or lawyer, or marketer, politician, etc.), you need to be aware of your readers' brain architecture. Otherwise your words and your intended message will be out of sync.

 
Rank Up Rank Down Votes:  +40
  • Print
  • Share
  • Share:

Comments

Sort By:
Jun 21, 2010
Orange = Porridge ?
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Apr 20, 2010
Giving Lady Gaga so much praise one might call you a sycophant, a word - among many - that rhymes with elephant?
 
 
Apr 4, 2010
This "brain architecture" theory lacks any evidence. If you said, "people rhyme well because they have a brain architecture that facilitates rhyming," one might respond, "how do we know they have that architecture?" to which the only answer is, "because they rhyme well." That's circular logic. The same datum is being used both to create the theory and to prove it. That people rhyme well is the fact that needs to be explained; it cannot also be used as the proof for the theory that effects the explanation.


Besides, how do we know that people rhyme well? Compared to what? One might just as well say that people rhyme very poorly, and their poor rhyming skills derive from their particular brain architecture. Both statements, that people rhyme well because they have a brain architecture that facilitates it, and that people rhyme poorly because they have a brain architecture that hinders it, have equal support: i.e., none.


You "think the brain stores words that sound alike near each other"? How? How are they stored "near each other"? If you cut into someone's brain, would you see similar words grouped together? How are words "stored" in the brain at all? As sounds or as letters or as images? And how is a sound or a letter or an image "stored" inside the brain? If a sound is stored inside the brain, does it make noise? If it is stored as letters or as an image, what does it look like when the owner of the brain isn't "looking at" it? If I ask you to "imagine an elephant," practically everybody reports the ability to do so, and according to you the image of the elephant is "stored" inside the brain (presumably next to images of hippos and rhinos, because of their similarity), but what does it look like, and where is it located, when you're not imagining it? It's such a relief to know I can always count on this blog to deliver such reliably stupid, raw, child-like, folk psychology.
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Mar 30, 2010
my accent is "mid-atlantic". When I talk orange rhyhms with "cringe".
 
 
Mar 30, 2010
@BruceLynn

I reckon Ange would want more than an orange to rub my feet and they're not even smelly. Maybe a bag of bananas would be more realistic.
 
 
Mar 29, 2010
infant elephant?
 
 
Mar 29, 2010
How about "sycophant"?
 
 
Mar 29, 2010
How about these two:

The sands of Dune are orange
Suffused with spice melange

There once was a brown-nosed elephant
Who was a pachydermal sycophant.

Close enough?
 
 
Mar 29, 2010
Smell of Scent, Bell of Tent, Hell Descent, Mellow Bent, Sell No Cent
 
 
Mar 29, 2010
Elephant -> Smell Of Tent

I hate that tent smell whenever I go camping!!!
 
 
Mar 28, 2010
Elephant?
Smell my pants.

Woonsocket rhymes with orange if you pronounce it just right.
 
 
Mar 28, 2010
Ra, ra, ah-ah-ah, roma, roma-ma, GaGa, ooh la la ... GaGa, ooh ka ka .......I S.H.1.T my pants!

@KaWraith - Compare Lady GaGa to Mozart? uhh no, It's just another weirdo fad, you'll see when they come and go as you grow up.
 
 
Mar 28, 2010
Storage rhymes with Orange. You have to pronounce it a specific way, but it works.
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Mar 28, 2010
What rhymes with "mullet"?

For some reason, I just thought about the monologue for the old "Battlestar Gallactica" TV show:

"A rag-tag fugitive fleet on a lonely quest...A shining planet known as Earth!"

Nahhh...No mullets in that one....

 
 
Mar 28, 2010
The 'murdered a doll' thing: I apparently use a different brain architecture. All that I got was 'that's odd - why would he kill a lump of plastic?'. I didn't for one second think of children. Dolls don't file anywhere near children in my brain - dolls are plastic, lifeless, synthetic, and artificial while children are warm, alive, organic, and human.

I think as a writer, you'd only be well equipped to understand your OWN brain organization (if I generously allow you can understand any such thing). I think you'd always be guessing about how other brains organize their data. So you'd end up swinging in the dark if you were trying to write to somehow avoid triggering associations in someone else's mind.

You see the clear gender-based version of this when men and women just don't understand one another on some subjects, but I suspect brain organization is far more individual than you suspect and therefore your idea is infeasible.

At best, you could guess what you thought maybe the majority of people might associate with a statement and then try to avoid that, but you notice all the qualifers therein... 'guess', 'maybe', 'might', etc. You'd not even be 100% sure you understood all the associations in your own mind let alone anybody else's. And assuming that you can please the majority of the people by avoiding accidental images is sure an exercise is self delusion.

Just write what feels right and creatively integral to you. The work will have an integrity and an authenticity that will accompany it. It won't seem like you are contriving expression to achieve a questionable end, it won't seem forced or weak.

Of course, by giving you any advice, I'm clearly falling victim to a form of delusion myself - you're the successful writer (but that may be partly luck) and I'm just some schmoe commenting on your ideas. Who am I to have the temerity to dispute your conclusions?

My only justification is your 'doll'/'child' association totally did not exist for me and one contrary example would generally disprove a theorem.
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Mar 28, 2010
I actually thought "celebrant"
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Mar 27, 2010
Nothing rhymes with elephant?

Can I say 'elegant' without you going all 'that's too similar' on me?
 
 
+8 Rank Up Rank Down
Mar 27, 2010
I liked your image about cleansing the mental palate. My memory is getting worse with age, and I often try to remember something by thinking each letter of the alphabet and swishing it around in my mind to see if the correct flavor comes through. I am unhappy to be losing my memory – if used to be very, very good – but it amuses me to analyze its decline. Oddly, I am better able to comprehend books and music, especially non-fiction and contrapuntal music, as if some block imposed on the way up is now bypassed on the way down. Why is this? I have never gotten old before.

I have worked with alcoholics, and they often seemed clever and funny. They came out with images and word combinations that were unique. Apparently their thinking processes had become skewed just enough to make what they said seem funny. Later, of course, they began to ramble and say bizarre things, eventually deteriorating into dementia. I realized I had been laughing at symptoms of a disease – the booze talking.

How much of literature has been C-U-I – Conceived Under the Influence? How much of religion and politics? Are the brain chemistries of creative people skewed in this way, just short of sickness? Maybe artistic output is the result of a benign form of dementia, useful if controlled. The question is, why do masses of so called average people value it? You would think the mutated thoughts would inspire revulsion and fear.

Adults of all species tolerate silliness in their young. Children play with language and it amuses us. Maybe aberrant thoughts from adults were more suppressed in the past than today. In the comfort of our civilized lives, we might tolerate and appreciate diversions, as long as not too perverse. Young people, as always, seem to delight in the perverse if only to annoy their elders.

Of course, performers have always used this opportunity to make money. I don’t think Lady GaGa is artistic as much as shrewd. Is her doggerel of any lasting value? Is it of value combined with the weird costumes? Song lyrics by themselves often seem trivial uncoupled from the music. The geek show used to be a guilty pleasure for circus goers years ago. Modern performers have capitalized on the concept to make a lot of money fast. By the time you realize they are charlatans with a limited ability to amuse, they’ve retired wealthy.

Who am I to judge? For me the world is speeding up year by year, it is becoming a blur of sights and sounds, and soon enough I will fall off the merry-go-round into oblivion.
 
 
+3 Rank Up Rank Down
Mar 26, 2010
bugrato, I think the idea is to rhyme each syllable of the word, not just the last, otherwise its too easy. Triumphant just wouldn't cut it where I went to elementary school (I admittedly didn't finish though).

What word rhymes with elephant?

Is the answer even relevant?
 
 
Mar 26, 2010
there are a few things that don't really rhyme... orange and silver are the best examples. quicksilver is the same. purple is pretty hard without some creative wordplay. Relevant/elephant is a bit of a slant rhyme, but it's pretty close, obviously I'm not the first to think of that, i even mused over petulant for a spell. Good to know I'm in the company of like-minded thinkers ;-)

As for Lady Gaga, I don't know if I or am the first with the prediction, but I think she's the next Mozart. If you haven't seen Amadeus, then that won't make much sense, but both are incredibly talented, something vastly overlooked by the majority who find their work "catchy" but don't think about why... and the real comparison is well, i doubt i can get it past the censors, but seemingly bat$@#% crazy and obsessed with toying with the socially taboo.
 
 
 
Get the new Dilbert app!
Old Dilbert Blog