Home
My Dilbert strip on Friday got the lowest reader rating ever: 2.5 stars out of 5. Part of the problem is that the published size of the so-called art was too small for you to see what was in the CEO's 's shirt pocket.

 
Here's a zoom on the CEO. He has a tiny regulator in his pocket. Try to imagine that the CEO's shirt has a trap door in the back of the pocket so the regulator can turn around and get a snack whenever he wants. It's efficient.

 

Yes, I get it. The comic still blows. It's gross. It's uncomfortable. It doesn't feature the stars of the strip. The phrase "in his pocket" isn't familiar everywhere.  I got a lot wrong on that one. But what I mostly got wrong is ignoring the Artist's Secret.

I learned the Artist's Secret in 1993. It was the first year that I included my email address in the spaces between Dilbert comic panels. Thousands of messages a day poured in. Readers told me what they liked about Dilbert and what they hated. In time I discovered a pattern that confirmed something I had heard from the Ancients but had never understood. (Okay, I heard it from one cartoonist. But he was old and hugely successful.)

The Artist's Secret is that all art comes from abnormal brains. So if you create art that satisfies your own tastes, you have created for a market of exactly one abnormal person. If you're lucky, a handful of other freaks get some joy from your creations too. But it won't be enough to pay your bills. It's not a career until you learn to create products that normal people like.

A lactating CEO with a tiny regulator in his pocket appeals to my own abnormal brain on every level. That should have been my first clue that it wasn't the sort of comic that would appeal to most readers. In retrospect, it's obvious.

I'll try to do better.
 
Rank Up Rank Down Votes:  +117
  • Print
  • Share
  • Share:

Comments

Sort By:
Sep 4, 2010
I loved this comic! I read it online, so had no problem with the size and recognising the regulator - I guess that reinforces how different content works best on different mediums.

I think it's healthy to occasionally include content for those of us with similarly abnormal brains! Keep up the great work
 
 
Aug 29, 2010
I agree with
Drowlord: It's not a problem to get the idea. It's obvious heavy satire lacking subtlety, so it's not that funny.
However there is no problem at all to see such strips occasionally.
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Aug 26, 2010
I guess i have good eysight too. Haveing just been involved with a certification programe envoling a small but inportant part ot the new boeing jet, it also resonated with me.
 
 
Aug 26, 2010
i liked it... but I guess that means I'm abnormal. Oh well, that isn't a big surprise.
 
 
Aug 26, 2010
那将是很有意思的事情
 
 
Aug 25, 2010
Well, I thought it was frickin' hilarious, and a welcome change of pace from the usual gang. Though it's even funnier magnified -- you see the babyish smile on the regulator's face.
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Aug 25, 2010
Like several other commenters I thought it was a hand-puppet, and completely missed the 'regulator in your pocket' joke.
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Aug 25, 2010
Scott,
I am the other abnormal person...the strip was very funny (sad to say!).
 
 
Aug 25, 2010
I liked it the first time and thought it was funny, but kind of gross. It wasn't my favorite or even close, but I didn't think it was bad. Did I mention it was kind of gross? I wonder if that turned some people off?
 
 
Aug 25, 2010
To me, it simply looked like he was holding a hand puppet in his left hand. Had you included BOTH the CEO's hands in the picture, then my tiny brain would have had to deal with that and come up with something better than him holding a puppet in his left hand. Oh, well. Water under-the-bridge, now.
 
 
Aug 24, 2010
I guess this comic could be funnier if 'lactating' could infer something that we experience...simply the idea of a regulator feeding himself out of a CEO is not funny enough...
 
 
Aug 24, 2010
Your post to go with the "The comic still blows" makes it NOT Blow - just makes it more real, especially for those who "try" to create on a daily basis.....Irene.
 
 
Aug 24, 2010
Now I get it!
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Aug 24, 2010
Dang ... I thought it was great ... but I already told you that I have an abby-normal brain. The pointy-headed guy lactating was what really sold it, but "kibble" is also a funny word in its own right. Now what that tells you about me, I don't know. :
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Aug 24, 2010
I thought it wasn't bad. It's fun to see comics about the sociopaths too from time to time.

Reminds me of this nice article that mentions work by Scott Adams, Douglas Adams, Mike Judge, Hugh McLeod, etc. Good stuff.
http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-or-the-office-according-to-the-office/
 
 
Aug 24, 2010
I got it right away, and more than that, I liked it. Not sure what that says about me, but it made me giggle.
 
 
Aug 24, 2010
You're right - I didn't see the guy in the pocket. I presumed it was a part of a series, with Catbert as the person he was talking about (that made more sense to me if the CEO was "lactating", and that he should try "kibble")
 
 
Aug 24, 2010
To me, this definitely is in the bottom ten of all your comics. However, even bad Dilbert is better than no Dilbert, which is pretty high praise of you think about it.
 
 
Aug 24, 2010
My comment on Monday got the lowest reader rating ever, somewhere around minus 7. Part of the problem is that I had Dogbert saying "Stop the rope, Senator!" instead of something like “"Stop the rope, Fortune 500 CEOs!"

Zoom in on my description of the first panel. “Senator”? Where did that come from?? Mr. Adams’ original cartoon made no mention of elected government officials. His cartoon was clearly about unelected, corrupt regulators being “in the pocket” of big business.

Yes, I get it. The comment blows. It was not well formed. It was distracting. It only features one star of the strip. The use of a such a gigantic pocket was a bit nebulous. I got a lot wrong. But what I mostly got wrong is ignoring the Commenter’s Secret.

I learned the Commenter’s Secret in 2009. The Commenter’s Secret is to first praise Scott. My comment may have seemed hurried and imprecise, but most damning, it gave the appearance that Scott’s work was tainted, and that’s not true. Scott Adams does not do tainted work. He is a GOD.

I'll try to do better.
 
 
Aug 24, 2010
I actually liked this strip, although the art work was hard to see. Nothing like a magnifying glass to help out.
 
 
 
Get the new Dilbert app!
Old Dilbert Blog