Home
Shopping is broken. In the fifties, if you wanted to buy a toaster, you only had a few practical choices. Maybe you went to the nearest department store and selected from the three models available. Or maybe you found your toaster in the Sears catalog. In a way, you were the hunter, and the toaster was the prey. You knew approximately where it was located, and you tracked it down and bagged it. Toasters couldn't hide from you.

Now you shop on the Internet, and you can buy from anywhere on the planet.
The options for any particular purchase approach infinity, or so it seems.
Google is nearly worthless when shopping for items that don't involve technology. It is as if the Internet has become a dense forest where your desired purchases can easily hide.

Advertising is broken too, because there are too many products battling for too little consumer attention. So ads can't hope to close the can't-find-what-I-want gap.

The standard shopping model needs to be reversed. Instead of the shopper acting as hunter, and the product hiding as prey, you should be able to describe in your own words what sort of thing you are looking for, and the vendors should use those footprints to hunt you down and make their pitch.

For example, let's say you're looking for new patio furniture. The words you might use to describe your needs would be useless for Google. You might say, for example, "I want something that goes with a Mediterranean home. It will be sitting on stained concrete that is sort of amber colored. It needs to be easy to clean because the birds will be all over it. And I'm on a budget."
Your description would be broadcast to all patio furniture makers, and those who believe they have good solutions could contact you, preferably by leaving comments on the web page where you posted your needs. You could easily ignore any robotic spam responses and consider only the personalized responses that include pictures.

You can imagine this service as a web site. The consumer goes to the section that best fits his needs (furniture, cars, computers, etc.) and describes what he wants, in his own words. Vendors could set key word alerts via e-mail or text for any products in their general category. Once they read the customer's needs online, they have the option of posting their solution, publicly, which gives other vendors and consumers an opportunity to offer counterpoints.

I assume this service already exists in some weaker form.
www.answers.yahoo.com is a step in the right direction, but it doesn't broadcast your needs to vendors. My prediction is that Broadcast Shopping (as I just decided to name it) will become the normal way to shop.

(Note: I am not using this blog post to solicit suggestions for patio furniture and toasters. Those were just examples.)



 
Rank Up Rank Down Votes:  +8
  • Print
  • Email
  • Share

Comments

Sort By:
Dec 6, 2009
The "Recommendations" forum on boardgamegeek.com is pretty successful, although the game recommendations are given by peer users, not businesses.
 
 
Dec 2, 2009


Send Christmas Gifts. Buy more to send. On this site __ http://www.global4biz.com

http://www.global4biz.com
sneaker: airmax 90, 95 etc $35-42 free shiping.
boots: UGG etc $60 free shiping.
Jeans : polo etc $35-49 free shipping
T-shirts : A&f etc $12-18 free shipping.
hoodies: 5ive etc $28-40 free shipping
handbags: Ed hardy etc $35-68 free shipping
Sunglasses: LV etc $17 free shipping
Belts: BOSS etc $15 free shipping
Caps: red bull etc $12-15 free shipping
Watches:rolex etc $80 free shipping

http://www.global4biz.com


 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Nov 24, 2009

A rabbit-rich world is a lettuce-poor world, and vice versa.
...
Now when we speak of an information-rich world, we may expect, analogically, that the wealth of information means a dearth of something else—a scarcity of whatever it is that information consumes. What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes that attention of its recipients. Hence a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention, and a need to allocate that attention efficiently among the overabundance of information sources that might consume it.

Herbert Simon (1969 !)
 
 
Nov 22, 2009
====================== http://www.ebusybiz.com ================== ====================== http://www.ebusybiz.com ==================
<<<<<<<<<> short time <<<<<<<<<><<<<<<<<<> free shipping <<<<<<<<<>
<<<<<<<<<><<<<<<<> competitive price <<<<<<<><<<<<<<> any size available <<<<<<<<>
<<<<<<<<<> accept the paypal <<<<<<<<<>
cheap nike shoes, fashion clothes ;brand handbags ,wallet
 
 
Nov 20, 2009
Yahoo answers isn't structured enough, and ebay's Want it now hasn't worked because they don't publicise it. Also, you cannot get directly in touch, only post your item and then tell them about it. Its obvious as e Bay would lose the listing fees and commission otherwise.

For small stuff, probably C2C but for bigger stuff it works very well and could level the field in terms of big media spend outgunning the small but competitive sellers.
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Nov 20, 2009
I'm with mcory. No one should ever point Yahoo Answers as a solution to anything. That cesspool of ignorance is just annoying enough with its high google rankings, hindering all my practical searches.

Please, Scott, don't support Yahoo Answers!
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Nov 19, 2009
eBay's Want It Now service sounds like what you're describing:
http://pages.ebay.com/wantitnow/

...but it doesn't seem to have taken off at all. I suspect that sellers would find it too labor-intensive to have to chase after each individual sale like that for small-ticket items.
 
 
Nov 18, 2009
Sadly, marketing and advertising don't really care about this particular problem. The purpose of marketing and advertising is to give you an emotional reason to buy something you don't need or want. They want you to make purchasing decisions for purely emotional reasons. If consumers were encouraged to shop analytically, it would drive down profit margins.

Also, If you could quantify all of a toaster's features and had a public service that made all the necessary comparisons, it would be clear that only one manufacturer made "The Toaster" that fit the sweet spot in terms of features, durability, style, and price.

All other manufacturers would be harmed by participating in that system. That one manufacturer, however, probably would not make "The Waffle Iron" that everyone would want, and therefore wouldn't want to participate on that site, either. And the corporate big-wigs might not even realize that their company made "The Toaster" to begin with.
 
 
Nov 18, 2009
Scott,

I'm late to the party, but check out Froogle.

www.froogle.com

Not all the way there yet, but pretty darned cool. I've used this for niche things that I know really well in terms of great deals, and the pricing / connections this pulls are pretty good.
 
 
Nov 18, 2009
@webgrunt:
I would assume that your censored word MarketWa tch contained the possibly dodgy word t_w_a_t. What a load of bollocks this software is!
 
 
Nov 17, 2009
Go to Amazon and sort by "highest rating."

Or, go to Sam's or WalMart and select one of the 3 products they have determined is the best bang for the buck.

This works for 98.265% of purchases. For items that are exceptional in price or importance, then take the time to read some actual reviews and do some actual research.

life is hard.
 
 
Nov 17, 2009
This already existis in the UK on findsyou.com. All they have done is turned the whole thing upside down. Base the whole thing on demand, and protect the shoppers, then make it automated for the sellers to make it easy for them. Its so simple that its a wonder it hasn't been done before - it used to be just for the uber rich and companies, but now available to us mere mortals.

This can only get bigger - search was a novelty once but now its the same people whio crop up all over the place
 
 
Nov 17, 2009
I don't agree that the root problem is the 'direction' of search. I think that the root problem is filtering out quality from dross. I think in your system one will still have the same problem of wading through noise. Instead of wading through crud that the search engine delivers to you, you will be wading through crapppy proposals that prospective vendors will be inundating you with.

The fundamental challenge of search is how to filter 'quality'. To date, the closest proxies to 'quality' have been (a) relevance (which is basically applying effective semantic net technoloy), and (b) popularity (eg. Google Rank, on the premise that a 'popular' site is a 'quality' site). The 'relevance' issue is well addressed with today's technology, but the popularity issue is as much a problem was ever because it is relatively easily gamed by SEO techniques.

www.dynamicwork.co.uk
 
 
Nov 16, 2009
Some times I think the seeing the real thing is the key to sucessful shopping. Pictures and descriptions can only go so far. Nice words and well posed items can distort the true appearance.
God forbid the curse words "some assembly required" should appear.
Another thought, maybe less and money should go into marketing and more effort into making products that last and perform as needed. We really need fewer items that really work well.
 
 
Nov 16, 2009
In Spain there is a service like that. A kind of social network with information about local providers accept your petition, they contact with verified local companies that could do the work and you receive an estimate.
The public can give opinions about the companies so if they cheat you, they get out the business.
This is a recent service and I found it very interesting. I don't know if it's copied from another one.
The web is 11870.es

Greetings from Spain!
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Nov 16, 2009
http://answers.yahoo.com is the LAST place you should go for advice. The intellectual midgets on that site give the worst possible responses, for the sole purpose of getting worthless "points" for their account. Check out this one guy who makes funny Yahoo answers for a living at http://www.snarkyanswers.com
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Nov 15, 2009
I think you have a great idea and yes it already exist, but don't dismiss the robot so readily. I did such a robot, to suggest a hotel website to people planning a trip in some cities. It was not all bot, it was using Amazon Mechanical Turk to add some humans to the equation. I can tell you that most people that say that they don't want to be interrupted, are not really saying this. They are saying they don't want to be flooded by irrelevant interruption. From my experience if you are relevant and offer a great deal, people love it. If they feel you did some work for them, they will even be sorry to tell you they already have plans.

To be clear Amazon Mechanical Turk is a service where you post unit of works and a price you are willing to pay, other look for unit of work to complete. It's a nice way to help artificial intelligence be more intelligent...
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Nov 15, 2009
This from a guy who can't fix his blog software cuss filter to allow the word 'cir c u mstances'.
Sheesh.

 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Nov 15, 2009
I can see this working for chasing down medical care.

I really hate having to go through a book of providers and pick the one doctor I think would suit me. For once, I want a doctor to do it. Put old Rex Morgan M.D. in front of a listing of ads and hear him say, "Let's see...This potential patient is 40-is, balding-ish, slightly mental, and has emerging health problems. I'd be a perfect fit for him!"

I also think this approach might work for Congress. Imagine being able to type the following into your "Potential Politician and Practical Plebe" website:

"Wanted: Individual interested in representing the persons of this state. Must have aversion to lobbyists, kickbacks and slush funds. Is directly focused upon the issues. Places loyalty to country above loyalty to party. Promises to not attach earmarks to unrelated legislation, a.k.a., the "Get-Rid-of-Pig-Smell" project in the last federal budget. Being an honest lawyer is an advantage."

Hmmmmm....I guess that's one Broadcast Shopping ad that will go unfilled......
 
 
Nov 14, 2009
The problem is you think this would solve your needs. Sellers would be out to sell you something (which suits their need) regardless of how well (or poorly) it suited yours. They'd try to convince you they had what you needed, but you'd end up still having to wade through a mountain of verbiage and lies and likely you'd end up buying something that wasn't really what you needed because of (factor unstated) or dishonest dealing.

Ultimately, I don't want to provide a mechanism to enocurage vendours to try to pimp their products to me, and neither do you. Of course, being Scott Adams, you might have some sexy intern to root through the endless options and find you the one you'd like based on your stipulations. But for most of us, we'd just get the personalized equivalent of spam... and lots of it.

What you really need is just good consumer reporting sites that compare lots of things, provide pictures and good specifications, as well as reviews pointing out this or that advantage *and that are not paid for in any direct way by the sellers*. If you could get this, you'd have exactly what you need - a place you could go look up a range of toasters, compare them, and read some reviews and the reviewers might actually clarify a lot of things that would suit your particular situation.

Of course, you can always construe some oddball scenario where your needs are so odd (I'm in one right now trying to find a laptop table that will fit on my mom's very narrow power chair) where nothing you find, even after a lof of research, will solve your problem - so you end up having to get a custom construction. Such is the way of the world.

Another option would be a service of 'finders'. You'd go there, describe your article, describe the comission, and the 'finder' would do the rooting around for you in the hopes of winning your commission. Your good might cost a bit more, but you should find the good that suits your needs without doing the search yourself. A company providing 'finder' services could actually work with somebody like Google to develop smarter searching tools and Google could work with the manufacturers to make product data available in some commonly accessible formats (something like XML or the like which could then be torn apart by many tools in different ways).

I think the Finder Service(TM) would be the way to go, rather than encouraging vendours to pimp you crap you don't need and that wastes your time. I think that's all your plan would result in.

 
 
 
Get the new Dilbert app!
Old Dilbert Blog