Home
Humans are obsessed with their weight. I think a big part of that obsession is the simple fact that weight is easy to measure. Scales are relatively cheap, accurate enough, and sitting right on the floor next to your shower when you need them. And you don't even need a scale to tell you when you're putting on a few extra holiday pounds. Generally speaking, we care most about the things we can easily measure, even if we know other things are more important.

The measurement bias is one of the problems with selling a concept like global warming to the masses. Individuals can't measure global warming, and it doesn't change much from day to day. Many people aren't even sure it's happening. That's why a link that a reader left in this blog's comments caught my attention. I don't have any affiliation with the company I'm going to mention, and have no opinion on its products or pricing. But I love the concept. It's a way to measure your household energy use and compare it to
your peers.

http://www.wattvision.com/

The service is in beta, and you can think of ten ways you'd prefer to see the data, but it looks like a step in the right direction. As soon as people can easily measure their energy use, it will become as much an obsession as weight and baseball stats and the stock market.

I harp on this theme a lot. I think that government in particular needs to provide a web-based dashboard of stats to its citizens so we can see how the country is doing. Trend graphs would be ideal. That would make clear where we need to put more resources. But it would also expose which politicians
aren't doing their jobs, so I doubt the government will ever create such a tool. And if a private group creates the dashboard, the data will be presented in a biased way. It's a tough nut to crack, but one that seems
essential to me. If you look at the evolution of democracy, the next logical step is providing useful data to the voters.


 
Rank Up Rank Down Votes:  +31
  • Print
  • Share
  • Share:

Comments

Sort By:
Mar 23, 2010
The last thing current politicians want is to provide their voters with usefull information!
Ps.
Please note that noways no one seriously talks about global warming anymore after the huge scandals with all the liying by al gore in his movies, the guy that edited all the entries in wikipedia regarding global warming and other eco-propaganda like mass extintions and all the forging of data that was discovered among the proponents of that idiotic theory that is not based in any serious science. Here in my country we call them "the watermelons"...they are green on the outside but red on the inside. Best definition so far.
 
 
Jan 11, 2010
I don't think being able to measure energy usage like this would make people care like they do about their weight.

When I gain weight: I know I gain weight, you know I gain weight, I know you know I gain weight

With this new service: I use more power, but no one knows that it's me who uses this power.

Even if this info were public: I use more power, you know I use more power BUT I don't know you know I use more power.

I think it's the last part that makes all the difference.
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 8, 2010
Ok Scott, it's been over a week with no new Blog. I'm starting to wonder if the stress of moving and the holdiays killed you and your family, and your rotting corpses are now making your beautiful new home reek of death. Or are you so blissfully happy in your dream home that you've become a hermit and have cut off all contact with the outside world. Please send up a blog flare to let us know you're ok.
 
 
Jan 8, 2010
The new year coming, click in. Let's facelift bar!

===== http://www.brandgoing.com/ ====

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33

Handbags(Coach l v f e n d i d&g) $35

Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30

Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,A r m a i n i) $16

New era cap $15

Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25

FREE sHIPPING

====== http://www.brandgoing.com/ =====
 
 
Jan 7, 2010
i can't stand it if people tell me to write; order me to write; demand i write.... i don't even like it if they ask nicely, with a polite request

i write when i want to; what i want to; how i want to

so i'd be the last person to suggest that you should get back to writing already! i mean, it's january 7th for goodness sake -you have fans!

are we supposed to keep re-reading this post a million times for some secret codes or messages?

oh!

of course! ..let me go see what i can find.
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 7, 2010
This has NOTHING to do with your blog post. I just read your latest Dilbert comic. "I synchronize my reports to weather forecasts," probably misquoted but close enough for you to remember.

No doubt you're aware how many words Twain needed to tell that joke in my favorite of all his books, and he didn't do it nearly so well. Three panels, dude! You rock!
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 6, 2010
Yes !! ... you are on to something. We should take every opportunity to measure 'our' government's performance. And hold politicians, elected officials, appointees, and hired government employees accountable to 'us' (called elections). Regarding official decisions made in the realm of city & regional planning, one bright CRP student once proposed a 'Quality-of-Life-o-Meter'.
Read more about it here:
http://givemeamomentblog.blogspot.com/2007/11/quality-of-life-o-meter.html

Every village should have one

!!
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 6, 2010
Mr. Adams;

Having government generate truthful lists of useful stats ??? GAAAAAAAAA !!!! The folly of believing that our government can be trusted to generate any list of truthful stats is illustrated by considering the unemployment stats. They are way too low. Why ? Because the powers in power will manipulate the measurements to minimize the chances of blame falling back onto themselves. Only stats which glorify the powers in power and/or stomp on their enemies will be brought forth. However, your basic idea is superb; no problem there. But having our government do it ? GAAAAAAAAAA !!! So who can do it ? Maybe a private sector establishment from a neutral country. Certainly that country and establishment would have to be chosen carefully. That country and that establishment would have to completely satisfy one criterion; that criterion being that they would have nothing to gain and nothing to lose by providing truthful stats to our citizens. Have an awesome day.

JAXID
 
 
-1 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 6, 2010
Mr. Adams;

Having government generate truthful lists of useful stats ??? GAAAAAAAAA !!!! The folly of believing that our government can be trusted to generate any list of truthful stats is illustrated by considering the unemployment stats. They are way too low. Why ? Because the powers in power will manipulate the measurements to minimize the chances of blame falling back onto themselves. Only stats which glorify the powers in power and/or stomp on their enemies will be brought forth. However, your basic idea is superb; no problem there. But having our government do it ? GAAAAAAAAAA !!! So who can do it ? Maybe a private sector establishment from a neutral country. Certainly that country and establishment would have to be chosen carefully. That country and that establishment would have to completely satisfy one criterion; that criterion being that they would have nothing to gain and nothing to lose by providing truthful stats to our citizens. Have an awesome day.

JAXID
 
 
Jan 6, 2010
Firstly on Global warming - my opinion is we simply dont have enough understanding to make a call one way or another. Our climate experts can't tell us if it will rain next week, let alone whats going to happen in twenty years. We are shown graphs with a correlation of temp rise and co2, but so what. I've seen graphns showing correlation with CO2 and pirates, doesn't mean it's true.

Secondly, even if GW is true, so what? The eart heats up a few degrees. Big deal.

Surely a larger problem is population growth and consumption? The global population has trebiled in the last 30 years. It's projected to hit 9 billion by 2050. Plus factor in the increasing amount people consume (think about all the aisan countries adaping US consumption).

IMHO we won't be worried about a slight rise in temp when we are locked in a struggle for the last of the worlds natural resources. I predicte China will invade Russia. The West will side with Russia and the whole thing will kick off big time.
 
 
-3 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 5, 2010
"But since that's what passes for debate in this country, I'm not surprised."

Gaaaaaaaaaaaaag!

"Our children aren't failing in school because of the teachers. And It's not the money. And it's not the government.

It's the parents. I went to public school here in Iowa. I graduated. Why? Because, for my parents, failure wasn't an option. I've seen countless kids drop out, not because they're stupid, but because their parents don't give a crap enough about school to make sure they showed up."

Well, maybe people wouldn't have children that they don't even care about if the government didn't offer the free babysitting. Yes, the schools are effective if the parents and by extension, the child care. But there in lies the problem. How do you change people's motivations short of coercive force. Hence the paddle back when my parents were in school. As somebody who just went through public school, it's insulting. You feel like you're being wearhoused and all teachers have in inflated sense of purpose. Plus, I laid out in my comment exactly what is wrong with education, and you aren't commenting on that. Also, you don't actually discuss performance or any measurements of performance in your entire comment.

"As for the football thing, that's kind of a sore subject for me. You see we are facing budget cuts here in Iowa. The community has sat back and allowed the school system to cut back on a few teachers and almost completely eliminated the art program from the high school. Their plan to get through next year's budget is to get rid of a few more teachers. We've tried and failed several times to build a new high school to replace the current one that was built to be a middle school back in the 1950's but the community keeps voting it down.

Our football team hasn't won a game in three years. We haven't had a .500 season in over twenty years. tkwelge, why don't you come up here and tell this small community that we could save those teacher's jobs if we got rid of the football program? Better come armed cause you'll be lucky if you get out of here alive. From what I here about Texas football, I doubt things are much different down there."

My point was that we waste a large amount of our time discussing things that don't really matter. Funding per child across the board has doubled and test scores are lower. You seem more concerned with finance and inter office politics than you do about actually focusing on what makes our education system not work.

"Let me ask you. Your parents are down there making $60K a year. How much does the head coach of the football team make? How many of your parent's students have gone on to go to college and become professionals? How many of the coaches players have gone into the NFL?"

Actually, we don't have much respect for our sports in my alma mater. Most of our coaches also had to teach some class on the side. I don't even think that we have a "head football coach." Maybe Iowans value sports more than Texans?

What's your plan? Cut back on sports and hire more teachers? Or pay teachers more? There is no link between higher teacher pay, or more teachers (which is impossible, because the supply is artificially small, and for political reasons, teaching jobs will never be deregulated enough to allow lots of cheap teachers to enter the market) and student performance. I'm no fan of sports, but how much money would ending the football program free up? And you're telling me the school system won't just waste that money too!
 
 
Jan 5, 2010
"You can't keep framing the argument the way that it was framed twenty years ago."

Our children aren't failing in school because of the teachers. And It's not the money. And it's not the government.

It's the parents. I went to public school here in Iowa. I graduated. Why? Because, for my parents, failure wasn't an option. I've seen countless kids drop out, not because they're stupid, but because their parents don't give a crap enough about school to make sure they showed up.

As for the football thing, that's kind of a sore subject for me. You see we are facing budget cuts here in Iowa. The community has sat back and allowed the school system to cut back on a few teachers and almost completely eliminated the art program from the high school. Their plan to get through next year's budget is to get rid of a few more teachers. We've tried and failed several times to build a new high school to replace the current one that was built to be a middle school back in the 1950's but the community keeps voting it down.

Our football team hasn't won a game in three years. We haven't had a .500 season in over twenty years. tkwelge, why don't you come up here and tell this small community that we could save those teacher's jobs if we got rid of the football program? Better come armed cause you'll be lucky if you get out of here alive. From what I here about Texas football, I doubt things are much different down there.

Let me ask you. Your parents are down there making $60K a year. How much does the head coach of the football team make? How many of your parent's students have gone on to go to college and become professionals? How many of the coaches players have gone into the NFL?

Long story short, we care more about sports in this country than we do education.

Ironically, that wasn't the point of my original post. Once again, you picked one line out of it to nitpick. But since that's what passes for debate in this country, I'm not surprised.

My original point was that, as Americans, we can't seem to get anything done unless we turn it into a contest. "Why should I try improve so long as I'm better then you." seems to be our mantra.
 
 
Jan 5, 2010
"You can't keep framing the argument the way that it was framed twenty years ago."

Our children aren't failing in school because of the teachers. And It's not the money. And it's not the government.

It's the parents. I went to public school here in Iowa. I graduated. Why? Because, for my parents, failure wasn't an option. I've seen countless kids drop out, not because they're stupid, but because their parents don't give a crap enough about school to make sure they showed up.

As for the football thing, that's kind of a sore subject for me. You see we are facing budget cuts here in Iowa. The community has sat back and allowed the school system to cut back on a few teachers and almost completely eliminated the art program from the high school. Their plan to get through next year's budget is to get rid of a few more teachers. We've tried and failed several times to build a new high school to replace the current one that was built to be a middle school back in the 1950's but the community keeps voting it down.

Our football team hasn't won a game in three years. We haven't had a .500 season in over twenty years. tkwelge, why don't you come up here and tell this small community that we could save those teacher's jobs if we got rid of the football program? Better come armed cause you'll be lucky if you get out of here alive. From what I here about Texas football, I doubt things are much different down there.

Let me ask you. Your parents are down there making $60K a year. How much does the head coach of the football team make? How many of your parent's students have gone on to go to college and become professionals? How many of the coaches players have gone into the NFL?

Long story short, we care more about sports in this country than we do education.

Ironically, that wasn't the point of my original post. Once again, you picked one line out of it to nitpick. But since that's what passes for debate in this country, I'm not surprised.

My original point was that, as Americans, we can't seem to get anything done unless we turn it into a contest. "Why should I try improve so long as I'm better then you." seems to be our mantra.
 
 
-1 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 5, 2010
OMG OMG OMG! I've been re-tweeted by Prof Brian Cox

ProfBrianCox

RT @PetraSky: See 5 Jan 2010 strip ~ http://dilbert.com/strips/

SO HAVE YOU!!!

Do you know what going on in the UK right now, re Scientific Research funding?
 
 
-1 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 5, 2010
OMG OMG OMG! I've been re-tweeted by Prof Brian Cox

ProfBrianCox

RT @PetraSky: See 5 Jan 2010 strip ~ http://dilbert.com/strips/
 
 
Jan 5, 2010
Hey, Scott: Have you given up blogging for the new year? It's been a week with no new posts!
 
 
-3 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 5, 2010
How does more money = better civics teachers? Especially since teacher pay exists outside of any rational market that properly allocates money for benefit achieved.
 
 
-3 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 5, 2010
"But why stop there. Why is it that the State Champion football team is glorified in the nightly news, but I have no idea how my school system stacks up when it comes to standardized test scores? Why don’t we turn graduation rates and test scores into a competition? We could have GPA rallys or SAT tournaments. Instead of hearing "We used to kick your butt in football." we would hear "Our school is smarter than your school." Maybe then we’d start paying teachers more than coaches and our schools could get back to creating engineers and not NFL quarterbacks.""

Teachers already get paid quite a good amount. I live in Texas where both my parents are teachers, and even without a teacher's union, they get paid about 60 grand a year if you include all benefits and stipends. Sadly, public education has formed into it's destined form, which is a government funded babysitting service, in which higher ups manufacture work and needless certifications to rationalize more and more money for teachers. The teachers benefit from the extra money, but all that busy work makes being a teacher suck. The certification system shrinks the pool of available teachers so that a tenth grade history teacher has to know calculus and be able to theoretically teach it. Nobody really wants to look at the failure our public schools have become, they just think it's a formula that they can just keep pumping money into.

Even so, the government can't create engineers anymore than it can create job. Our government's "everybody needs to go to college" attitude has created a situation in which only 25 percent of jobs require a college diploma, meanwhile 35 percent of the population holds one. Also, how many of those college jobs are government generated?

The whole, "Sports is zapping resources from creating leaders of the future" argument is such a lame eighties and early nineties argument. I heard that growing up all through the nineties. I heard people argue that only if we could get more computers in the classroom, it would be worth having less football helmets. However, go into the local public school in your area. How many classrooms have computers? How many teachers have computuers (in my parents districts they get their own laptops)? How big is the computer lab? Even though the number of computers has exploded, what has happened to test scores? Well, they're the same or lower.

You can't keep framing the argument the way that it was framed twenty years ago.
 
 
-2 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 5, 2010
"Throw all of that out the window. Generating and using energy costs money, therefore it is a really good idea not to waste it. But we Americans don’t seem to want to do a damn thing about anything unless it’s a competition. We care more about the Super bowl than we do about the national debt. Why don’t we use the "us against them" attitude that drives this country to our advantage. "

I think that people have been trying to use us vs them attitudes to achieve political ends for thousands of years, and we see what that does. Also, one thing about the aughts that I want to go away is the needless generalizations. "All americans believe this, or all americans believe that." Americans are so diverse and vary by state, class, race, and age.
 
 
Jan 4, 2010
To jonmalone:

"Utility companies could start posting energy usage figures in the newspaper. That way my home town could brag that we use less energy than the town next to us. If I knew that my neighbor burnt less LP than I do, it might guilt me into turning the thermostat down. We could start a "State Championship" of energy frugality.

But why stop there. Why is it that the State Champion football team is glorified in the nightly news, but I have no idea how my school system stacks up when it comes to standardized test scores? Why don’t we turn graduation rates and test scores into a competition? We could have GPA rallys or SAT tournaments. Instead of hearing "We used to kick your butt in football." we would hear "Our school is smarter than your school." Maybe then we’d start paying teachers more than coaches and our schools could get back to creating engineers and not NFL quarterbacks."

I think that could work a different way. Every year they give out numbers for the fattest city in the US. Some cities actually pride themselves that they win that competition. I think some people wouldn't really care and would actually try to make that number larger. Think about those radar speed detectors that display your speed. There are a lot of people I know that love to see their speed much higher than it is supposed to be.

As far as graduation rates and test scores, I agree that they should be posted. But again, it would end up being a lot of information that is useless to the average public. There would be people for and against standardized testing and saying that even though the scores were low, their students know more. Plus, to people who see a C as a good score, they don't typically care how many people get above that. Most of them have probably played football, enjoyed playing it, and like to watch it. I am generalizing, but most of the people I know that got good grades were not sports people and could care less about what the scores were. However, these types of people care a lot about the numbers and often have competitions within themselves to drive the GPA, SAT scores, etc higher. Because this number of people is typically smaller in most areas, then the number of people who would be influenced by posting GPAs and SAT scores would also be small. Unfortunately, information available to the masses is usually dictated by what sells, which in most cases is sports, not education. There will always be small pieces on education, but almost never at the level that sports is covered.
 
 
 
Get the new Dilbert app!
Old Dilbert Blog