Home
Today's blog is for science nerds only. I provide you with three media data points and turn you loose to connect or reject them.

First, the New York Times is reporting that a respected string theorist is saying gravity is an illusion emerging from the mechanics of atoms. Another respected physicist says gravity is an illusion caused by the differences in entropy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/science/13gravity.html?_r=3&pagewanted=1&ref=homepage&src=me

In other recent news, physicists working with the Large Hadron Collider are rumored to have found evidence of the so-called God Particle (Higgs boson) that would theoretically explain why other particles have mass.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/large-hadron-collider/7885997/Large-Hadron-Collider-rival-Tevatron-has-found-Higgs-boson-say-rumours.html

Thirdly, I point you to page 55 of my book God's Debris, written ten years ago. It's the chapter titled Physics of God Dust. (It only makes sense if you read the entire book, but most of you have, so this is just to jog your memory of that chapter.) The free pdf download is here:  http://nowscape.com/godsdebris.pdf

Years ago I read a fascinating book (I can't recall the title) that described how throughout history the great discoveries of science were preceded by art. In other words, if you looked at the paintings and fiction that were becoming popular just before the scientific breakthroughs of the times, you would see that the styles of thinking necessary for specific scientific breakthroughs had recently begun to permeate society at large. Or to put it in more poetic terms, humanity gains knowledge about its own reality when it is collectively ready for it. That readiness is reflected in art.

Skeptics will rightly point out that you can find any pattern in history if you try. True enough. But it's still such an interesting notion that it's worth considering, even if only for fun.

My discussion of physics in God's Debris isn't an exact match to what the physicists are discussing in the links I provided. But if someday the idea is validated that gravity is an illusion caused by probability and entropy, it will seem as though art, including but not limited to God's Debris, predicted humanity was ready for that knowledge.

Update: Thanks to reader Alanc for correctly identifying the book about art preceding science.   The more relevant sequel is Art and Physics by Leonard Shlain.

http://www.amazon.com/Art-Physics-Parallel-Visions-Space/dp/0688123058



 
Rank Up Rank Down Votes:  +7
  • Print
  • Share
  • Share:

Comments

Sort By:
Aug 10, 2010
Hi Scott

One last clarification:
The Physics community talks about Dark Matter to explain strange gravitational issues, so I will say it once and for all.. "Dark Matter IS Dense Space-Time!". I have issues in using the term 'Matter' as applied in the term 'Dark Matter'.

See.. a Planet has NO inherent Gravity, believe it or not! No large body of mass has Gravity. A large body of mass condenses space-time around it. Space-time simply gives matter traction. Matter is not attracted to Matter on the Macro Scale. Matter does however seek and travel towards higher density space-time through the probabilistic motion of it's atoms.

Let's suppose I had a machine that could instantly teleport the whole planet Earth (all atoms) to where it would be in 4 weeks, with the same orbit and same trajectory. Here is what would happen: Everything on the planet, not nailed down, would fly off into space because Earth has left it's gravitational field behind. The planet would rip itself apart due to centrifugal forces and internal pressure. Meanwhile.. our Moon would still continue orbiting the space just vacated by the planet Earth until the space-time center was shredded and dissipated by the motion of the Moon. Then the Moon would fall into a new orbit around the sun. The planet Earth would eventually gather it's lost space-time back up and re-form (don't expect to find anything alive) or perhaps turn into another asteroid belt, depending on a number of factors.

If you could instantly transport the matter within a Black Hole to a distance of a few light years, the Black Hole itself would explode and the high gravity field left behind would continue to travel for quite some distance until it interacts with another body of mass. In this respect it acts like a compressed wave. But it doesn't interact with itself. It has no internal self pressure to dissipate it. We see this effect in the Bullet-Cluster (1E 0657-56) of several galaxies that have crashed and have torn themselves up. Space-time (Gravity) and Matter have become displaced in many places. "The bullet cluster is the best example for proof of Dark Matter existing.". It actually proves Variable Space-Time Density exists, and not Dark Matter.

Paraphrasing the relativist John Archibald Wheeler, Space-Time tells Matter how to Move; Matter tells Space-Time how to Curve. In this case Curvature is another way of expressing variable Field Density of Gravity or Space-Time.

Here is another interesting insight: The Universe isn't Expanding.. It's actually Shrinking! As long as those physicists insist on using a Light-Year as a ruler by which to measure distance then it's easy to prove shrinkage. It's all so obvious that I fail to understand how so many can take so long in recognizing something proved by Einstein almost 100 years ago.

Ok.. that's all for now..
Best wishes Scott from Dave Oblad
 
 
Aug 4, 2010
It seems Scott was very close with this strip:
http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1990-03-07/
:-)
 
 
Jul 18, 2010
In God's Debris, the theory was, "Gravity is reducible to probability." In that terrible NY Times article, it's, "Gravity is reducible to entropy." Hey, entropy is like probability! I don't think it's close enough. Especially since ideas like "Let's reduce gravity to a more basic phenomenon," and "everything is reducible to some general law of entropy," have been seriously pursued at least since quantum physics. There's no prediction here.
 
 
Jul 16, 2010
Alastair said "I am sure gravity is an illusion caused by falling over too much."
Semantics again. Scientists are always coming up with new terms to demonstrate how brilliant they are. Theoretical physics is ego driven blather and does about as much good as discussing how many angels can stand on the head of a pin.
Might as well say what Newton said. That gravity is the love of God holding everything together.
An illusion is commonly accepted as something nonexistent in the material world though visually observed. It's no illusion to suggest planes fall.
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Jul 16, 2010
I'd say that art precedes science because science starts hinting at something. Artists can jump ahead on the guess while the scientists still need to finish their research to make sure they're right. Looking back from a couple of decades down the road you see the art that successfully predicted while the art that didn't has been forgotten. Rockets and robots advanced in art long before they did in science. Somehow we forget the stories where they used fax machines on those rockets.

Similarly, we look at new houses and old houses and say "they used to make houses better" when in fact the poorly built houses have fallen or been knocked down and are no longer used as a point of comparison. All we can honestly say is that bad houses today aren't built as well as good houses X number of years ago.

Alternatively, the scientific topic could have been researched because of the art. Mobile phones moved toward becoming Star Trek communicators. Flying car research continues because it's what we want, not because it's particularly a good idea. iPads and Kindles look remarkably like PADDs from Star Trek, Andromeda, and a bunch of other shows. I'd kill you all for Doctor Who's Sonic Screwdriver or K9.
 
 
Jul 16, 2010
not about today's post, but i hope scott has a phone in his elevator.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100716/ap_on_re_us/us_elevator_couple_dead;_ylt=AgI0HhdkXaB0Zob9iXvKDrGs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTJrcXUwa2s0BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwNzE2L3VzX2VsZXZhdG9yX2NvdXBsZV9kZWFkBHBvcwM3BHNlYwN5bl9tb3N0X3BvcHVsYXIEc2xrA2VsZGVybHljb3VwbA--
 
 
+2 Rank Up Rank Down
Jul 16, 2010
I'm no where near intelligent enough to understand a 10th of what this is all about. What I can say is that the professor from Amsterdam thinks that reality is an illusion (first link). I spent a weekend in Amsterdam, and I can tell you that I also thought that gravity was an illusion at times.

That's not science thats horticulture!
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Jul 16, 2010
Hi Scott,

Is the book title "Proust Was a Neuroscientist" by Jonah Lehrer?
 
 
Jul 15, 2010
Hi Scott

When I explain Gravity to my friends I use the following example:

Imagine a Pasture filled with Small Stones, Mud and a Horse loose within.

The horse doesn't like stepping in the mud, so it only steps on the randomly spaced stones. This horse will wander randomly about with no discernable pattern. And if anyone suggests throwing in some Hay, you are taking my example way too literally.

Now add many more horses to make a herd, where each horse is loosely chained to all it's neighbors. The behavior of the herd is such that as a whole, the herd doesn't go anywhere. Each individual is always tugging in random directions but the average for the herd is zero motion.

Now change the pasture slightly by Increasing the distance between stones at the West end of the pasture and Decreasing the distance between the stones at the East end of the pasture. Something new begins to happen. The herd will slowly migrate to where the stones are more closely spaced. The reason is simple enough.. the area with closer stones offers more freedom of movement as more choices are available of where to randomly step. In other words, given random motion, we have increased the probability of movement towards a denser region because more choices are available. It's that simple.

The horses are behaving like atoms bound together. An individual atom or horse will basically wander about because the range of probability is so even. But as a group dynamic, a cluster of random but bounded motions will statistically center where density is greatest. That is gravity. The Horses are Atoms, the Pasture is a Gravitational field. Down is towards greater Field Density.

If you hold a glass of water in your hand, all the atoms are vibrating in random directions and the net result is zero. However, in a gravity field, a tiny percentage will statistically tug towards greater density. So the weight you feel of the water is just the tiny percentage of atoms that are tugging towards a greater density. If all the atoms in that cup choose the same specific direction, such as down, then that cup of water would suddenly weight many tons.

This is the behavior I saw in a computer simulation I created many years ago. At the time I didn't connected it to the behavior of Gravity. It was just an interesting study in statistical motion.

I also witnessed another property: If I put the group in motion towards a target, it tended to stay in motion. Think of the dynamics in a herd of bound horses. The lead horses are pushed forward by the bulk of the herd which is dragging the rear horses along. You are now seeing the function of Momentum as it pertains to random motion favoring a specific direction. If this herd crashes into an idle herd, the Momentum is transferred, a compression wave is created in the new herd and it takes off.. leaving the previous herd to settle down. You have now been witness to a kinetic energy transfer.

This is why I take the next step in predicting that a frozen herd will not obey gravity law because there is no probability motion within. I take it still another step to predict a frozen herd will not obey the laws of momentum. And again, if anyone thinks I'm talking about freezing horses and not atoms, they are still taking me way too literally. The idea of freezing is near absolute zero for atoms. Zero at Centigrade works for horses too..lol.

To Scott specifically: I read 'Gods Debris' many years ago and very much enjoyed it. I also want to personally thank you for providing this Blog where Ideas can be presented to an Intelligent Audience. My personal Blog on Cosmology has over 450 hits now, of which at least 80 percent is from your readers or word of mouth from the same. I am seeing that ideas, like the one above, are having a real measurable impact on the Science and Physics Community. That a great revisionism in Cosmology is well underway. For this voice I am truly grateful.

Best wishes..
Dave Oblad


 
 
Jul 15, 2010
OK so where does the theory of inflation come into this conversation?

On a side note can't you make it so that people can't post that are trying to sell us crap it's becoming more & more common here (and I can't believe that length of the one on here today)

Elf
 
 
Jul 15, 2010
Simple solution
There is gravity because the earth sucks

 
 
Jul 15, 2010
Scott

Thanks for replying. I think The Dilbert Future's appendix on Affirmations Technique is there because you thought it was useful in some way? Perhaps the reason affirmations works is that it helps in self-hypnosis of some sort. I have an issue with the angle where something good is supposed to happen magically through some cosmic forces or something.
 
 
Jul 15, 2010
My way of thinking is that gravity is a model, I understand the properties of it and have certain expectations of it and it's met my expectations. The what of what makes the physical world around behave the way it does, is based in a number of theories, still up for debate. It's fun to absorb of all the different concepts and debates on why the 'gravity model' works the way it does. I could say the same thing about the air model on frisbee when I throw it, curse the wind when it affects my air model.
 
 
Jul 15, 2010
I finally got around to reading Gods Debris. Most of it was hardly new to me (like the concept that there is no way to rationalize free will, or that all perceptions are only imperfect models of reality, etc.). The notion of God Dust was interesting, though. I'll have to think of some way to test that theory! ;)

 
 
-14 Rank Up Rank Down
Jul 15, 2010
Company Introduction
Fujian Jinying International Trade Co., Ltd. is a leading company founded in 2008, specialized in the supply of domestic first-class products both at home and abroad. On the basis of our operation principle “Brand goes simultaneously with quality, talents grow together with career” and our purpose of providing an authentically superior and mutually beneficial service, we sincerely look forward to the cooperation with various countries so that we can work together to play an important role in the market with a view of making greater success in the future course of business.
Our company has invested 1 million U.S. dollars totally, half of which is the registered capital. We are mainly engaged in the supply of various brands of watches, shoes, clothes, bags, glasses, electronics, etc. Such as NIKE, JORDAN, ADIDAS, BOSS, ARMANI, BALLY, BURBERRY, CHANEL, CHLOE COACH, D&G, Dior, FENDI, Gucci, LV, Versace, UGG, EDHARDY, etc.
We can develop the Template and produce the goods as your request. Also we can agent the OEM to produce the products you want, we ensure high quality and competitive price. As to the enterprise management, we adhere to have “people first” as our guiding ideology to emphasize our enterprise culture. We have www.abciabc.com <a href=http://www.abciabc.com> wholesale website</a> as our E-commerce platform, which is a B2B E-Commerce Website and we have started to provide service for sellers and buyers both at home or abroad in 2009. As a member of B2B online trade, we are proud to be a gold member of Alibaba.com and Dunhuanggate.com. We have customers from more than 230 countries and regions such as America, Australia, Europe, Asia, etc. and have more than 10 million Chinese suppliers so that we can provide our customers with a wide range of inexpensive products and a fast and convenient online shopping with a professional service team. Our trust market and intermediary services of payment process ensure us a safe and reliable shopping environment. We have seen the rapid growth of our business indicators, including gross-year deal, order number, registration number of buyers and sellers.
Our commitment is: we ensure the safety of transactions.
Our philosophy is: professional, honest, trustworthy.
Our service aim is: provide customers with the most reasonable price, the best products and the best service.
Our payment methods: PayPal, credit card, Western Union.
Our shipping method: DHL Express, Federal Express, TNT Express, ESL Express.
Our goal is to establish a good relationship with customers around the world. We welcome all of our customers to visit our company to inspect our products and negotiate business with us.
B2B platform for web-site address:
http://www.abciabc.com/wholesale_site.htm
hotmail: liuweibing69@hotmail.com
 
 
-2 Rank Up Rank Down
Jul 15, 2010
If the theory of art preceding reality is true then WHERE THE FRACK IS MY FLYING CAR?!?
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Jul 15, 2010
As a larvi I had a dream I was a man in a world with something called gravity that held me fast to the ground, when I awoke I was a butterfly with nothing to hold me from the sky. Now I will never know if I'm a man dreaming I am a butterfly or a butterfly who dreamed I was a man. Envy my dual reality.
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Jul 15, 2010
This is a very good discussion of the entropic explanation of gravity here:
http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2010/07/whats_the_most_fundamental_thi.php

 
 
Jul 15, 2010
Another great book on this same topic is "Faust was a Neuroscientist"
 
 
Jul 14, 2010
The Universe is a perpetual motion machine in the same way that a casino without betting limits is a bad loans banking machine. For you see, the universe can eternally double or nothing against entropy ;)
 
 
 
Get the new Dilbert app!
Old Dilbert Blog