Home

The other day I was at the Small Dog Park. It's a fenced area where dogs under 20 pounds can frolic with each other. I was chatting with a friend, whose dog is named Indy, about a movie I just watched involving a dog named Marley. After my friend left, I met a guy who has two Italian Greyhounds, coincidentally named Marley and Indy.

I don't know the odds of discussing two dogs named Marley and Indy, immediately followed by an unrelated discussion of two different dogs named Marley and Indy. I'm thinking it is in the smallish category.

Speaking of coincidences, I have started noticing that all movies are about me personally. For example, the Marley and Me movie is about a guy who writes humorous columns about his dog. My last blog post prior to watching the movie was a humorous piece about my own dog. (See below.) The writer in the movie worked in a cubicle at one point, and if you look closely at the comic hanging on his wall, it's Dilbert.

There's a bit of selection bias in this coincidence. I did know it was about a dog. But I wasn't aware it was about a writer who writes humorous bits about his dog. And I didn't expect to see one of my drawings in it.

Still, it seems that every time I watch a movie or a TV show lately there is at least one element that is yanked directly from my life. And I don't mean the obvious stuff such as "we are both humans." The connections are usually pretty obscure.

I have to remain true to my skeptical roots and explain these coincidences away with references to selective memory, and pointing out that it would be even stranger if there were no coincidences at all, given the richness of life's experiences. But it got me wondering if there is any way to design an experiment to test the theory that life is an illusion.

Obviously the illusion could be so well designed that all testing of it would be cleverly thwarted. So a negative result would mean nothing. But suppose this illusion was providing a fire hose of ongoing clues. What would those clues look like?

One possible clue is that your life might have what I will call a theme. For example, Steve Jobs' theme is that he can turn any business into a huge winner. You might call that skill, but he still had to be in exactly the right places at exactly the right times for his particular skill to be useful. I don't think he would have been much of a hunter/gatherer.

You probably know people who are the opposite of Steve Jobs, able to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory again and again, through no obvious fault of their own. It looks like extraordinary bad luck. That's a theme.

If your name is Kennedy, you might have good luck with love and money and power, but bad luck with transportation. Stay away from PT boats, convertibles in Dallas, cars in rivers, and small aircraft. That's a theme.

Some people are lucky in love, but unlucky in health. That's a theme. You get the picture. So ask yourself if your life would look entirely random from an objective viewpoint or is there a recurring theme. If you have a theme, you might be a product of design.

Another clue that life is an illusion is that perceived reality might have inexplicable dead ends or cracks. Consider the physics study of entanglement, where particles influence each other at any distance, which is seemingly impossible. Or consider that light is both a particle and a wave. Physics is full of examples where reality seems to have cracks and dead ends.

How would you test to see if life is an illusion?

 
Rank Up Rank Down Votes:  +9
  • Print
  • Share
  • Share:

Comments

Sort By:
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Aug 18, 2009
"But suppose this illusion was providing a fire hose of ongoing clues. What would those clues look like?"

Perhaps yet more "coincidences"...

Aug 5, '09: The world watches a horse galloping onto the windshield of a car in Israel:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJJzj05TTAQ&hd=1

Aug 17 '09: In Argentina, the "echo" of the first incident:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdngRfl-hdM

...Note that in both cases there were three horses involved: two dark, one white and one of the dark horses was the protagonist.
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Jul 26, 2009
"I honestly don't believe in coincidences in life. Things happen for a reason and I think this is the second message." -- Rubens Barrichello, Formula One driver, regarding the following "coincindence". As in recent plane crashes and emergency landings, notice that the second event is a less serious "echo" of the first event...

19 July'09: Formula Two driver Henry Surtees was killed in what was described as a "freak" accident during a race at Brands Hatch -- struck by a wheel which flew off a competitor's car.

25 July'09: Formula One driver Felipe Massa is in stable condition following emergency surgery after he suffered skull damage and concussion -- struck by a spring from Rubens Barrichello's car which flew up and hit Massa's helmet.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/motorsport/formula_one/8168807.stm
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Jun 30, 2009
So yet more evidence that life is a SHARED illusion comes with the news today of a plane crashing in the Indian Ocean just weeks after a similar event in the Atlantic:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8125664.stm

...Major events are echoed weeks later on a smaller scale and in a different location -- on Feb 6 I commented here:

More evidence that life is a SHARED illusion comes with news of an airplane ditching into Darwin harbor after engine failure at take-off:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7874423.stm

...of course, like the similar event in the Hudson three weeks ago, all the passengers were thankfully saved from the almost certain end of their illusion of life.
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Feb 22, 2009
Scott ~ From Scientific American Magazine, February, 2009:

"...we need to take seriously the idea that the world's history plays itself out not in the three-dimensional space of our everyday experience (...) but rather this gigantic and unfamiliar configuration space, out of which the illusion of three-dimensionality somehow emerges."

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=was-einstein-wrong-about-relativity

With the article focussing upon "quantum entanglement", a comment there asks: "What if locality and non-locality are 'entangled'?"

And a Buddhist text on awakening from Maya (illusion) says: "‘When a wise man, established well in Virtue, develops Consciousness and Understanding, then as a bhikkhu (monk) ardent and sagacious he succeeds in disentangling this tangle. (...) The inner tangle and the outer tangle -- this generation is entangled in a tangle."

...So by "developing Consciousness" we can disentangle this quantum entanglement and free ourselves from the "illusion of three-dimensionality". The consciousness we already have active is the "local" one -- that of our five senses. The Consciousness we need to develop is the "non-local" one -- and that can be activated by diligently paying attention to one's peripheral vision. As the Diamond Sutra says of the Buddha: "He began mindfully fixing his attention in front of himself..."
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Feb 6, 2009
By the way, in my post two down from here about the strong logical argument that we are in fact living in a simulation...I forgot to mention the person that came up with it, Nick Bostrom, is a professor at Oxford University - not some nutcase.

Just thought that might be important.

http://www.simulation-argument.com/

 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Feb 6, 2009
More evidence that life is a SHARED illusion comes with news of an airplane ditching into Darwin harbor after engine failure at take-off:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7874423.stm

...of course, like the similar event in the Hudson three weeks ago, all the passengers were thankfully saved from the almost certain end of their illusion of life.

Anyone notice that these timely coincidences around the world happen with large building fires too?




 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 26, 2009
Scott - I am a little late to this party but I read all the comments and nobody directed you to this web site:

http://www.simulation-argument.com/

This guy has a pretty strong logical argument that we *are* living in a simulation! I think you would find this VERY interesting just on it's bulletproof logical reasoning alone. I was dumbstruck by it.

I expect to see blog entry about this! :-)
 
 
Jan 26, 2009
Experiments seem like a wasted effort. One could look for all the signs that were revealed in The Matrix. Things like glitches, instances where physical rules did not apply, instances where perception controlled reality. The downfall to this strategy is that the better the simulation is, the better these limitations are masked.

Here is an idea. Let's consult the wisdom of crowds. Here is an estimate of the religious beliefs of the world population:

Christians 33.32%
Muslims 21.01%
Hindus 13.26%
Buddhists 5.84%
Sikhs 0.35%
Jews 0.23%
Baha'is 0.12%
other religions 11.78%
non-religious 11.77%
atheists 2.32%
(2007 estimates from cia.gov)

The first two groups give us over 50%. As luck would have it, both of those religions believe that this life is a simulation. Your behavior in this simulation determines your destiny in the next. You go to heaven or hell, depending on how you conduct yourself. Many other religions not in the first two groups share similar beliefs, so I think we can agree it's not a small margin deserving of a recount. The majority of the world population has a stated belief that includes a belief that we live in a simulation.

There is the small matter of a reporting bias here. However this data was collected, at some point, people reported themselves as members of the groups that hold these beliefs. There is no practical way to confirm each reported case can lead us to conclude that every person in that group believes the mortal life is a simulation and the life after death is the one that matters.

For this, we can turn to the great, modern-day philosopher Scott Adams. In one of his fictional work, he proposed a test of people's commitment to beliefs like this. I am paraphrasing here, but his ideation boiled down to this: If people really believed that their life-span in this simulation dictated their fate in the eternal life, wouldn't they spend this brief stage of their entire existence following the rules exactly? 72 years is a short time in the grand scheme of things. Couldn't you spend that brief time living exactly as your book of choice tells you to live?

There are no CIA statistics that report how many people follow the 10 commandments as if their eternal life depended on it, so I can only introduce hearsay and anecdotal evidence. I would venture to guess that a statistically insignificant number of people behave as if they truly believe that we live in the simulation. Faced with the stated belief contrasted against the belief revealed by behavior, I would conclude that people have given great thought to the simulation hypothesis and rejected it.

So I'm saying the wisdom of crowds points towards a conclusion that we do not live in a simulation.
 
 
Jan 17, 2009
I don't know why, but the comment I posted just now displays the word c-i-r-c-u-m-s-t-a-n-c-e-s as if it's a bad word, like %#^&$#.
 
 
+1 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 17, 2009
Every life has a theme. For 99.99% of people, that theme is the one of repeating the same mistakes over and over again and subtly learning from those mistakes until they stop making those mistakes or else reach the end of life and come back to earth in the next incarnation to more or less pick up where they left off. The !$%*!$%*!$%*! of one's life (genetics, environment) are the !$%*!$%*!$%*! that best give them opportunities to learn the lessons that they still have outstanding, and it's all finally an illusion. This is the substance of Hinduism, Buddhism, and related philosophies.
 
 
Jan 15, 2009
Scott, you of all ppl may find this fascinating: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126911.300-our-world-may-be-a-giant-hologram.html?full=true

It is an article posted today about the possible discovery of the graininess of space time, aka the telltale hallmark of our hologram-i-ness.

www.lanceeldert.com
 
 
Jan 12, 2009
"How would you test to see if life is an illusion?"

I pinch myself every hour on the hour!
 
 
Jan 9, 2009
It's shocking to me how you keep expressing my innermost thoughts. I wonder if somehow we're actually the same person.

I suspect that we see evidence that life is a sort of illusion or hoax often, but ignore or reject or "fail" to notice this evidence because we're afraid to let go of our illusion.

I still say the only thing that can be known for certain is that perception exists. Everything else could be an illusion, but an illusion isn't an illusion (or anything, really) unless it's perceived.
 
 
Jan 9, 2009
I would also suggest that Kennedys stay away from skis, especially while playing football with water bottles.

http://www.cnn.com/US/9712/31/kennedy.update.2/
 
 
Jan 8, 2009
Is there not close to an infinity of themes one might concoct to explain their life's experiences?

As to your examples pointing toward life being an illusion, perhaps our "models" explaining realty are deficient. That light behaves like our models predict waves AND particles depending on the context convinces me we as yet haven't found the bedrock explanation for light. Just because we don't understand it doesn't mean illusion or magic is the explanation.
 
 
Jan 8, 2009
Every time I read one of your articles, I cannot but realize a strong undercurrent of the basic philosophy in Hinduism in it.

In this article you talk about finding(knowing, looking for) a theme for your life and ancient Hindu texts talk about identifying one's purpose in his life. Some heavy handed explanation of "identifying one's purpose in life" has lead people to believe that it is indeed some thing divine which noble men practice and lay men strive for.
Add to that, the english word purpose which isn't exactly the same as karma.

What else is it other than fulfilling ones purpose in case of Steve Jobs? He has realised that he has a knack for having a different perspective of things. He uses this to his benefit and is where he is now because of that.

Similarly, one can say the same about people who aren't successful in what they do. Its just that they have found their purpose in life in exactly the same way as those who are successful.

And then off course I could also site the similarity between maya and illusion that you have mentioned.

I am sure you will have a lot more to offer, if you do readup something along these lines.
I am keen on reading it.

Regards,
Abhinav
 
 
Jan 7, 2009
This is f*cking ridiculous.

This is stupid, you might be going crazy, maybe you should see "someone".
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 6, 2009
Particles and waves aren't "real", they're just models we use in order to explain some characteristics we observe in the real world. Light turned out to be too complicated for these simplistic models, and since we don't have a better model to fill in the gap yet, we sort of glue one together from the bits and pieces that we have to work with.

That being said, what exactly is the difference between an illusion and reality? To formulate a conclusive test, you'd need explicit definitions of the two terms. Likely, while attempting to come up with definitions, it will become evident why a test is impossible.

The theme of my life is getting what I want only to find out I might have just as well not bothered.
 
 
0 Rank Up Rank Down
Jan 6, 2009
Hey, on a semi-related note, check out today's (1-6-09) Urban Dictionary word of the day.
 
 
Jan 6, 2009
I see the slope of your descent into solipsism syndrome is steepening...
 
 
 
Get the new Dilbert app!
Old Dilbert Blog