Share this page with other Digg Readers or tell others you "Dugg" it.
Share on Reddit
Share this page with other Reddit Readers or delegate points for this page.
Woh! What is this thing?!
This is a social bar from the Dilbert team and our friends at Meebo. It is a cool little feature we've added to Dilbert to make sharing comic strips, Mashups and other content, a simple click of the mouse from any page.
Try it out – use the buttons to instantly send the next funny comic you read to your Facebook status or your Twitter feed. We’re adding even more ways to share soon, so check this space often!
When we get our zero raises in September, this strip is forwarded to the whole company -and the HR department- with 'Subject': "Which kind of employee will you be?"
Sorry, I'm with ewood & all who agreed with him. If your medium for expression is the English language, at least try your best to not be a knucklehead when using it.
Well, you may find it acceptable to butcher your native language in spite of your ability to write the language correctly, but it bugs me. I have no respect for poor writing, even if the internet and cell toys have made the written word more "utilitarian" than it was previously.
"Who'd of" is a homonym of who'd've which is a contraction "who would have". On the interwebs, especially comments, it is generally acceptable to type like one would speak or in txt speak rather than the strict rules of grammer. I would speak say "I'm'll" or "who'd've", but if I was writing a thesis or research paper I probably would use "I will" or "who would have"
I'm starting to like ewood less and less these days.
