Share this page with other Digg Readers or tell others you "Dugg" it.
Share on Reddit
Share this page with other Reddit Readers or delegate points for this page.
Woh! What is this thing?!
This is a social bar from the Dilbert team and our friends at Meebo. It is a cool little feature we've added to Dilbert to make sharing comic strips, Mashups and other content, a simple click of the mouse from any page.
Try it out – use the buttons to instantly send the next funny comic you read to your Facebook status or your Twitter feed. We’re adding even more ways to share soon, so check this space often!
Seems to me that there is no "logical fallacy" in Zeno's paradoxes, merely a false assumption or two. A specious argument is not the same as a logical fallacy. If I said something like "the double-slit photon test cannot produce an interference pattern" there would be no error in my logic, but I'd still be wrong.
Of course, there may be an error in my logic......
Thanks for the link amischiefr. The wiki was very educational for me. All I can say is that I'm glad I studied engineering where occam's razor rules. ie: I can simply assume that logic works unless or until an actual case turns up where it doesn't work. I don't have to worry about whether logic is logical!
